SpaceX retires Dragon crew arm at Pad 39A, clearing the way for Starship in Florida

SpaceX has taken a visible step in reshaping Florida’s launch landscape: the Crew Dragon access arm at Kennedy Space Center’s Launch Complex 39A is gone. With astronaut missions moving to Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40) at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, the storied pad that hosted Apollo and Shuttle is being reconfigured to prioritize Starship and heavy-lift operations.

Below, we unpack why this pivot is happening, what it unlocks for SpaceX and NASA, and how it could reshape operations on the Space Coast over the next few years.

Background

Few pieces of spaceflight real estate carry as much weight as LC-39A. From Saturn V moonshots to the Space Shuttle era, and more recently Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy, the pad has been repeatedly reinvented to match the needs of the moment. When SpaceX leased 39A from NASA, the company added a horizontal integration facility, a transporter-erector, and—crucially for human spaceflight—a crew access tower and swing arm for Crew Dragon.

For years, that made 39A the sole U.S. launch site certified for flying astronauts on commercial crew missions. Centralizing human launches there had obvious benefits for SpaceX’s cadence, but it also concentrated risk. Starship’s arrival on the same campus amplified those concerns. A giant methane-oxygen booster demands more robust ground systems and a wider safety buffer than Falcon 9. NASA has been explicit about wanting redundancy for crew access and insulation between crew operations and experimental heavy-lift activity.

That is why SpaceX built out a second Dragon tower at SLC-40 in Cape Canaveral. SLC-40 had already proven to be a workhorse for Falcon 9 cargo and satellite missions. Adding human-rated access hardware—elevators, a white room, and emergency egress systems—turned it into a parallel crew pad. With that redundancy now in place, SpaceX can decouple astronaut flights from whatever construction, testing, or risk comes with standing up Starship a few miles north at Kennedy.

At the same time, Starship itself is marching toward larger-scale operations. Initial integrated flights from Starbase in South Texas established a learning curve and a path for iterative improvements. Florida offers something different: robust range services, a well-understood regulatory pipeline for high-cadence launches, and trajectory options that are friendlier to many commercial missions, national security payloads, and future crewed operations tied to lunar ambitions.

What happened

• SpaceX removed the Crew Dragon access arm from LC-39A’s tower. That swing arm is the bridge astronauts walk across to board Dragon. Its absence signals the pad will no longer support near-term crewed Falcon 9 missions.
• Astronaut flights will now originate from Cape Canaveral’s SLC-40. SpaceX has constructed and activated a new crew access tower there, complete with the safety and ground support features required for human spaceflight.
• With crew operations shifting south to SLC-40, SpaceX is clearing and reconfiguring 39A to focus on two priorities:
  • Sustaining Falcon Heavy and select high-complexity Falcon 9 missions that benefit from 39A’s robust infrastructure.
  • Building out Starship “Stage 0” in Florida—i.e., the fixed ground hardware: an integration and launch tower with stacking/catching arms, an orbital launch mount, cryogenic storage, deluge and sound suppression, and flame management.

This change reduces operational entanglement. It separates astronauts, fueling ops, and recurring crew cadence at SLC-40 from the heavier construction and commissioning work necessary to bring Starship online at 39A. It also addresses NASA’s long-standing risk posture: avoid a situation where an anomaly during heavy-lift development could sideline the nation’s only commercial crew access point.

Why SpaceX is doing this now

Several overlapping forces make this the logical moment to pivot:

• Crew redundancy achieved: With SLC-40’s crew tower in service, there is no longer a single-point dependency on 39A for human flights.
• Starship needs room—and a different kind of pad: Supporting the world’s largest rocket requires new plumbing, higher flow cryo systems, beefier deluge, and larger safety standoffs. The old crew arm at 39A occupied structure that isn’t needed for Starship and could impede tower modifications.
• Risk segregation: NASA and SpaceX both benefit if experimental heavy-lift operations are physically separated from astronaut prelaunch activities. Moving Dragon to SLC-40 compartmentalizes that risk.
• Cadence and logistics: Two crew-capable pads allow schedule flexibility for NASA missions, commercial astronaut flights, and contingency windows, while freeing 39A for the most infrastructure-intensive work.

What changes at the pads

Launch Complex 39A (Kennedy Space Center)

• No near-term Crew Dragon boardings from this tower.
• Continued Falcon Heavy support and select Falcon 9 missions that leverage 39A’s flame trench and ground support.
• Progressive installation of Starship ground systems. Expect visible signs such as:
  • Tower segment stacking and outfitting of mechanical “chopsticks” used for stacking and potentially catching Starship stages.
  • An orbital launch mount separate from Falcon hardware, with new methane/oxygen lines and chilldown systems.
  • Expanded water-deluge infrastructure and sound suppression to handle higher acoustic loads.
  • Changes to lightning protection and exclusion zones to account for Starship’s scale and exhaust plume.

Space Launch Complex 40 (Cape Canaveral Space Force Station)

• Operational home for NASA crew rotation flights, private astronaut missions, and cargo Dragon.
• A dedicated crew access tower and swing arm with emergency egress systems adapted to the pad’s layout.
• Continued high-cadence Falcon 9 satellite missions, sharing the site through careful flow management.

What it means for NASA and commercial users

• Resilience for crew access: Two crew-capable pads in close proximity means tighter scheduling and less vulnerability to construction delays or pad turnarounds.
• Artemis deconfliction: 39A sits a short distance from 39B, the Artemis pad. By removing routine astronaut operations from 39A during Starship buildout, NASA reduces the chance that a heavy-lift anomaly could ripple into Artemis schedules.
• Path to Florida Starship operations: For large payload providers, national security missions, and future human lunar architecture, a Florida-based Starship enables higher-cadence, broader-inclination launches with mature range support.

Technical and safety considerations

Transitioning pads is not just about swapping hardware. It entails a basket of engineering and regulatory tasks:

• Human-rating SLC-40: Every piece of the crew tower—from elevator redundancy to white room seals—must meet stringent certification. Emergency egress routes, blast protection, and fire systems are all tailored to that site.
• Fueling philosophy: SpaceX’s “load-and-go” approach—loading propellant late in the countdown with crew aboard—remains under tight oversight. Implementing it at SLC-40 required re-analyses of hazards and abort timelines specific to the pad’s geometry and systems.
• Sound and plume management at 39A: Starship’s thrust and acoustic loads call for deluge upgrades and robust pad hardening. The goal is to avoid the kind of concrete spalling and debris seen in early Starship tests in Texas.
• Range safety and blast modeling: Florida operations must demonstrate acceptable risk profiles to the Eastern Range, including debris footprints, overpressure, and toxic hazard corridors for methane and oxygen scenarios.

Strategic implications for SpaceX

SpaceX’s long-term strategy hinges on high-cadence, low-cost access to orbit with Starship, supported by a reliable Falcon 9 backbone. The 39A/40 split sharpens those roles:

• Falcon 9 and Crew Dragon continue as the dependable revenue engine—now with their own crew-focused home at SLC-40.
• 39A evolves into a dual-use heavy site: sustaining Falcon Heavy while maturing Florida Starship stage-zero systems.
• If Florida-based Starship propellant depot and on-orbit refueling concepts come to fruition, 39A becomes a cornerstone of lunar and deep space logistics supporting NASA’s plans and commercial operations alike.

Key takeaways

• The Crew Dragon access arm at LC-39A has been removed, signaling an end to regular astronaut launches from that tower.
• Human flights will now originate from Cape Canaveral’s SLC-40, which SpaceX has outfitted with a dedicated crew access tower and safety systems.
• Freeing 39A from crew ops clears the way for Starship infrastructure and reduces operational risk to NASA’s commercial crew program.
• Expect visible Starship stage-zero construction at 39A alongside continued Falcon Heavy use.
• The move strengthens cadence, redundancy, and range management on the Space Coast ahead of more ambitious heavy-lift operations.

What to watch next

• First full cadence of crew launches from SLC-40: Watch how SpaceX and NASA manage pad turns between crew and high-frequency satellite missions at the same site.
• Starship tower buildout at 39A: Signs of tower segment stacking, installation of stacking/catching arms, and progress on the orbital launch mount.
• Deluge and flame management upgrades: Evidence of new water systems or trench adaptations to handle Starship’s acoustic and thermal loads.
• Regulatory milestones: FAA launch license modifications for Florida Starship operations and environmental assessments specific to methane-fueled heavy lift.
• Falcon Heavy scheduling: How SpaceX sequences heavy missions at 39A around Starship construction to maintain manifest commitments.
• Risk posture updates: Any refinements to exclusion zones, lightning protection, and emergency egress reflecting the coexistence of Falcon and Starship hardware at Kennedy.

FAQ

• Why did SpaceX remove the crew arm at 39A?

  • To eliminate overlap between astronaut operations and Starship construction, reduce risk to crew missions, and repurpose the structure for heavy-lift infrastructure.

• Will astronauts ever launch from 39A again?

  • Not in the near term. With SLC-40 now set up for crew, SpaceX can keep 39A focused on heavy-lift. A future return would only make sense if operational needs change.

• Is Falcon Heavy still using 39A?

  • Yes. Falcon Heavy relies on 39A’s ground systems, and those missions can continue while Starship hardware is added in parallel, with careful scheduling and pad segregation.

• Does this mean Starship is ready to launch from Florida?

  • Not yet. Removing the arm is an early step. Starship needs a full suite of ground systems, testing, and regulatory approvals before Florida liftoffs.

• What happens to Boca Chica (Starbase) in Texas?

  • Starbase remains vital for rapid iteration and initial flight testing. Florida complements that with mature range support and access to a wider set of orbital inclinations and mission profiles.

• How does this affect NASA’s Artemis program?

  • It reduces the chance that heavy-lift development work at 39A could disrupt Artemis operations at nearby 39B, strengthening schedule resilience for lunar missions.

—

Source & original reading: https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/02/heres-why-americas-most-historic-launch-pad-is-getting-yet-another-facelift/